Journal submission polish with a reviewer rubric tuned to PNAS reviewer expectations and PNAS style. Voice-consistent to you (in development)r other writing so your manuscript reads like the same author across drafts. Edit-history attestation PDF (in development) on export, in case the editorial office or reviewers ask.
Multidisciplinary science (us nas-tied). ~6,500 word research article + Significance Statement (120 words). Citation: Numbered, in-text.
Significance Statement is a unique requirement and the first thing editors read. Member-track submission still common. PNAS resists hype; understated framing wins.
The rubric shifts to PNAS reviewer conventions. PNAS style signals (structure, abstract format, citation discipline, length compliance) are weighted; generic style-agnostic edits are deweighted.
If we have a reviewer profile for the specific programme (MPhil Computational Biology), the polish suggests where to add programme-fit specificity. We never invent names of faculty, courses, or labs you didn’t name yourself.
If you’re submitting a main statement plus supplements (common for Cambridge), every document polishes against the same voice fingerprint so they read as the same person.
A single paper polish covers one manuscript end-to-end. A Submission Pass covers high-volume polish (fair-use applies) + response-to-reviewer letters across a full submission cycle, with one voice fingerprint across every document and a edit-history attestation PDF (in development) on export.
Verified .edu / .ac.* graduate researchers: $69/yr Submission Pass.