Personal statement polish with a reviewer rubric specifically tuned to MIT admissions (MIT-specific app · direct grad). Voice-locked to your other writing so your supplement reads like the same person who wrote your main essay. Signed Disclosure Bundle PDF on export, in case the admissions office asks.
Specific research alignment expected. Naming faculty is standard (not seen as flattery).
Department-by-department review; faculty alignment must be in the first paragraph.
The 23-criterion rubric weights shift to match MIT admissions conventions. US-specific signals (e.g. hedging norms, programme-fit specificity, statement length conventions) are weighted higher; generic US/UK averages are deweighted.
If we have a reviewer profile for the specific programme (PhD EECS), the polish suggests where to add programme-fit specificity. We never invent names of faculty, courses, or labs you didn’t name yourself.
If you’re submitting a main statement plus supplements (common for MIT), every document polishes against the same voice fingerprint so they read as the same person.
A single statement polish covers your main essay. An Application Bundle covers every document MIT asks for, with one voice fingerprint across all of them and a signed Disclosure Bundle PDF on export.
Verified .edu / .ac.* students: $59 bundle.