Personal statement polish with a reviewer rubric specifically tuned to MIT admissions (MIT-specific app · direct grad). Voice-consistent to you (in development)r other writing so your supplement reads like the same person who wrote your main essay. Edit-history attestation PDF on export, in case the admissions office asks.
Specific research alignment expected. Naming faculty is standard (not seen as flattery).
Department-by-department review; faculty alignment must be in the first paragraph.
The reviewer-aware polish weights shift to match MIT admissions conventions. US-specific signals (e.g. hedging norms, programme-fit specificity, statement length conventions) are weighted higher; generic US/UK averages are deweighted.
If we have a reviewer profile for the specific programme (PhD EECS), the polish suggests where to add programme-fit specificity. We never invent names of faculty, courses, or labs you didn’t name yourself.
If you’re submitting a main statement plus supplements (common for MIT), every document polishes against the same voice fingerprint so they read as the same person.
A single statement polish covers your main essay. An Application Bundle covers every document MIT asks for, with one voice fingerprint across all of them and a edit-history attestation PDF on export.
Verified .edu / .ac.* students: $59 bundle.